Toiling Aimless

Waxing Philosophically About The Utter Lack of Utility Inherent In Genuine Exercise of Free Will: An Argumentative Approach in Search of Dialectic Resolution

Thursday, October 29, 2009

I used to consider myself a math major.

I wonder if what research has been done into investigating the existence of irrational numbers between the integers. I am curious about the distribution of terminating and non-terminating repeaters relative prime numerators and denominators.

Inquiry: Do irrational numbers exist between 0 and 1 that can be represented without irrational numbers of an absolute value greater to one?

Conjecture: If you append the digits following the decimal in pi or e to any integer you have an irrational number. More broadly, for any irrational number k, and any integer n: k-k.floor+n is an irrational number. Can it be shown that the transfinite set of values falling between any given integers n and m does not contain a value that terminates or repeats for n+(k-k.floor)? How could it, as (k-k.floor) is by definition non-terminating and non-repeating.

e.g. The number pi - pi + n is irrational for integer n.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

It would be swell...

Gosh golly gee, I would really like a network of clones of my brain and a few dozen supercomputers. I wonder if anyone makes a wetware network interface yet. I have really got to plan my time travelling better. I think I am going to go see if I can play Diablo.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Reflective Psychosocial Predispositions in Human Nature

If an individual belonging to a particular group and inculcated in the culture of the group transfers onto an internal model of human nature, is the expression of antisocial tendencies an immutable negative characteristic or a learned predisposition against a particular set of psychosocial memes incorrectly assumed to be specific to human nature by the solipsistic tendencies that themselves are partially derived from those same inculcated memes?

How is that for a pseudo-banality? Of course banality is in effect a fallacy. Avoiding an extension of presupposition of commonality to mental representations of phenomena is essential to the search for syllogistic soundness, fraught with the semantic of colloquium as it is.

Pardon the pathology of my neological declensionisms...