If an individual belonging to a particular group and inculcated in the culture of the group transfers onto an internal model of human nature, is the expression of antisocial tendencies an immutable negative characteristic or a learned predisposition against a particular set of psychosocial memes incorrectly assumed to be specific to human nature by the solipsistic tendencies that themselves are partially derived from those same inculcated memes?
How is that for a pseudo-banality? Of course banality is in effect a fallacy. Avoiding an extension of presupposition of commonality to mental representations of phenomena is essential to the search for syllogistic soundness, fraught with the semantic of colloquium as it is.
Pardon the pathology of my neological declensionisms...
Monday, May 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
